Spicy Takes Feed
A curated aggregator of 28 prominent technology writers, organized by "heat" (engagement). About 1,000 recent posts from people like Bryan Cantrill, Julia Evans, Wes McKinney, Martin Fowler, DHH, John Gruber, and George Hotz.
Key Themes
The value proposition is editorial curation disguised as aggregation. The 28 writers are chosen for having strong, specific viewpoints rather than neutral takes. The "heat" ranking surfaces the most-discussed pieces, creating a de facto conversation tracker for the tech discourse.
The contributor list reveals the editorial stance: heavy on infrastructure thinkers (Cantrill, Hashimoto), data engineers (McKinney, Späti, Reis), and design critics (Gruber, DHH). Light on AI hype merchants. The result is a feed that skews skeptical-but-engaged -- people who build real systems commenting on how AI and industry trends affect real systems.
This is useful as an input to AI Coding Weekly and similar digests. Rather than trying to follow 28 individual blogs, you get a single firehose filtered by the crowd's engagement.
Critical Analysis
The curation is the product. Anyone can build an RSS aggregator; the hard part is choosing the 28 voices. The risk is that it becomes an echo chamber of a specific tech subculture (infrastructure-heavy, skeptical of VC hype). That's also its strength -- if you want that perspective, this is the most efficient way to get it.
Missing: any non-English voices, anyone from the Global South, very few women. The tech commentary ecosystem has a known diversity problem, and a "best of" aggregator inherits it.
Sources: Spicy Takes Feed Last updated: 2026-05-14